Identifying and responding to social conditions and risks so that next generation decision tools contribute to a fair, sustainable and productive land sector in Australia
Why is it important to include social dimensions when developing agtech?
The development and implementation of new technologies is shaped by social factors such as who is involved in the design process and how and why people use them. These social dimensions are in many ways just as important as the underlying technical aspects. As new areas of science and technology are pursued it is important to understand and include different people’s views about the social and ethical impacts of new technologies.
Digiscape is one example of significant efforts internationally to realise the transformative potential of digital agriculture. However, there are many social and ethical challenges associated with the digital transformation of agriculture.
Understanding and responding to the needs and concerns of stakeholders in the land sector is a vital part of developing new agricultural technologies. Science can help ensure that these technologies are relevant and useful as well as avoid potentially negative, unintended consequences for rural and agricultural communities. And that they’re sensitive to impacts on farming practice, labour as well as issues of data access, ownership and privacy.
What did we do about understanding social dimensions in developing agtech?
The Digiscape Social Dimensions project focused on improving our understanding of the social, ethical and trust dimensions of digital technologies that are seeking to transform agriculture. It aimed to help identify and respond to the social conditions and risks relevant to the digital tools being developed within Digiscape.
Our research shared insights into how to include stakeholder perspectives in the development of digital tools to ensure socially responsible benefits and improved uptake.
For example, the team worked closely with the Digiscape Carbon project to identify co-benefits (i.e. non-financial benefits of a land use change) as an important part of the broad decision-making context for landholders. Within the Digiscape Great Barrier Reef project, our team co-developed a framework for understanding and tracking the digital experience that helps to explain the process of digital technology acceptance (or non-acceptance).
We also examined the broader context of digital technologies in the land sector, including the implications of new technologies for agricultural knowledge and advice networks, the current state of Australia’s policy networks relevant to digital agriculture and potential scenarios for different futures of farming in Australia.
We also collaborated with the Responsible Innovation Future Science Platform to develop two short courses that translate CSIRO’s cutting-edge science on Responsible Innovation into work-based learning in the digital agriculture domain. More information on the courses will be available soon.
Read more about our work
Digitalisation and agricultural knowledge, advice and policy networks:
Case studies of the social dimensions of industry-based digital tools:
- Emma's expertise is in the sociology of science and technology to help improve understanding of technology development, implementation and adoption processes in the digital transformation of Australian agriculture. Emma led Digiscape's social dimensions project.