Frameworks and Processes

Proposes where entry points for transformative change are emerging. While actions for transition are underway in different sectors, they are often fragmented, and their valuable lessons and knowledge are rarely shared. We synthesised theoretical insights with empirical evidence into a coherent framework of nine key entry points for driving systemic change that has potential to be meaningfully applied in prospective design of integrated sustainability transition agendas and interventions. The nine entry points we identified can foster the exchange of effective practices and facilitate the cross-pollination of ideas, creating a foundation for knowledge sharing on what works (and what doesn’t) in systemic change.

For further information, contact Dr Enayat A. Moallemi.

Actor roles, responsibilities and agencies are not fixed throughout transformation process. We propose a new heuristic that reframes actor roles in terms of their transformation functions and the dynamic capabilities required to initiate, support, and sustain change. This moves beyond the dichotomy of top-down vs. bottom-up, and instead highlights the need for better coordination and synchronisation across actor types to accelerate transformative outcomes. Recognising the diversity of functions for actor roles and the potential for these functions to shift over time offers a new more dynamic lens for designing and evaluating transformation strategies.

For further information, contact Dr Costanza Conti or Dr Andy Hall.

Proposes the design and functions of monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) processes for navigating system change and with recognition of their complexity and uncertainty. It provides a set of design considerations for a more system-oriented, responsive, and formative mode of MEL and presents a set of functions this type of MEL might perform, from accountability tracking to system-level learning and boundary processes like engagement and trust building.

For further information, contact Dr Philippa Hammond.

Offers a reflective, learning-based framework that integrates justice into food system transformation and helps build transition capacities by guiding actors to navigate power imbalances in the complex and deeply uncertain landscape of agri-food systems. It complements systems learning by providing direction on how to move forward with stakeholders in ways that address justice and equity trade-offs.

For further information, contact Dr Costanza Conti or Dr Andy Hall.

Proposes a knowledge co-production framework provides an inventory of participatory tools and guides how can partners of sustainable development projects work together and with stakeholders to co-produce knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes and tailored to feature of projects in the context of deep uncertainty.

For further information, contact Dr Enayat A. Moallemi.

Explains how the design of research organisations can help institutionalise a learning-based approach to agri-food system transitions, highlighting different worldviews on the future of agricultural research, each underpinned by distinct priorities, forms of action, actor involvement, and visions of success.

For further information, contact Dr Costanza Conti or Dr Andy Hall.