Analysis of a Black Smoker, Sea Floor, Hydrothermal Vent

Ancient volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits are an important source of minerals in the world today. Understanding how these deposits have formed is an important step to finding new deposits. Unfortunately, the original structure of these deposits has been lost due to millions of years of metamorphism and tectonic upheaval. However, it is known that these deposits originally formed through hydrothermal activity at the sea floor, and therefore, by studying modern, sea floor, hydrothermal vents, we can learn about the original ore forming processes of the ancient VMS deposits. 

(a) Schematic representation of sea floor, black smoker, hydrothermal vent. The vent is layered as shown. (b) Backscattered electron image (BSE) of a cross-sectional sample taken from the chalcopyrite-sphalerite region shown in (a). The sample is porous (black regions of the image are pores), and the major phase (medium grey) is sphalerite. The white phase in the image is a Pb/As sulphosalt, and the darker phase is chalcopyrite. The red rectangle shows the location of the next figure.

To this end, a sea floor hydrothermal vent has been analysed to determine its internal structure. The vent is shown schematically in (a). Analysing a cross-section of the chalcopyrite-sphalerite region, the internal structure of the vent is found to be very porous. The matrix is predominantly sphalerite, with inclusions of chalcopyrite and pyrite, and there is a lead/arsenic sulphosalt around the edge of the central pore (seen as a white phase in (b). The sphalerite grows predominantly in globules that have grown into each other, producing the “cauliflower” type appearance seen in cross-section in (b).

This figure shows EBSD results, at low and high magnification, from the region indicated by the red rectangle in the last figure. The grey images (a and b) are pattern quality maps, the blue images (c and d) are phase maps, and the coloured images (e and f) are orientation inverse pole figure (IPF) maps (IPF Z). The pattern quality maps (a and b) show the grain structure of the sulphide phase from the chimney wall. The structure is a duplex structure, consisting of large grained regions and small grained regions. This structure is even more apparent in the orientation maps of (e) and (f). The phase maps of (c) and (d) indicate the presence of 4 phases, sphalerite, wurtzite, chalcopyrite and pyrite. Sphalerite and wurtzite have identical chemistries (both are nominally ZnS), but sphalerite has a cubic crystal structure and wurtzite is hexagonal. Therefore, these phases can be differentiated by EBSD, but not by EPMA or EDS. This is a powerful reason why these two techniques are frequently used in tandem to characterise a sample. The wurtzite, seen as red laths in (c) and (d) seems to be zoned. It seems to be concentrated at the edge of the globules and at other regions within the globules. There is also evidence of a depleted zone within the globules as shown in (d). For a detailed explanation of how the wurtzite and sphalerite form in the chimney wall see Reference 1.

(a) and (b) Low and high magnification (respectively) pattern quality EBSD maps of the region indicated by the red rectangle in the previous figure. The grain structure is evident in these images. (c) and (d) EBSD phase maps of the same areas shown in (a) and (b). These maps show the presence of wurtzite laths in the sphalerite matrix. The wurtzite seems to be enriched at the boundary between the globules and zoned within the globule. (e) and (f) Inverse pole figure, orientation maps for the same area as above. The duplex structure of coarse and fine grains can be seen in the matrix of the chimney wall, but there is no obvious correlation between the grain structure and the zones indicated by the dotted lines in the image.


In addition to the zoning of wurtzite, this region of the chimney wall is chemically zoned. This can be seen in the EPMA results for this region shown in the figure. (a) and (b) are backscattered electron images at the same low and high magnifications used in the previous figure. Chemical zoning is evident in these images, and these zones are indicated in (b). (c), (d) and (e) are all EPMA elemental maps for Pb, As and Fe, respectively. The chemical zoning is most evident in these maps. Zones enriched and depleted in Pb, As and Fe are all shown in these maps, and these zones correspond to the zones marked with dotted lines in (b). They suggest subtle changes in the composition of the hydrothermal fluid during the growth history of the chimney wall.

(a) and (b) Low and high magnification BSE images, respectively, of the area indicated by the red rectangle in the first figure. Chemical zoning is evident in both of these images. (c) EPMA map for Pb showing colloform zones rich in Pb. (d) EPMA map for As showing colloform zones rich in As. (e) EPMA map for Fe showing areas rich in Fe and depleted in Fe. The areas which are rich in Fe are depleted in Pb and As.


(a) and (b) show chemical line profiles across the yellow line in the previous figure. The globule boundaries show enrichment of Pb and As, as shown in (b). The globule boundaries also show a depletion of Fe in these regions. These chemical variations are attributed to solute redistribution during crystallisation of the sphalerite chimney wall.

Reference

Matthew Glenn, Siyu Hu, Stephen Barnes, Aaron Torpy, Anthony E. Hughes, Colin M. MacRae, Nathan A.S. Webster, Nicholas C. Wilson, Joanna Parr and Ray Binns, “Investigation of the Internal Structure of a Modern Seafloor Hydrothermal Chimney With a Combination of EBSD, EPMA, and XRD”, Microscopy and Microanalysis, DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927620001580